|
Documents show Gonzales approved firings
[Link is Broken]
http://news.yahoo.com
By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - Last week, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said he was not
involved in any discussions about the impending dismissals of U.S. attorneys.
On Friday night, however, the Justice Department revealed Gonzales'
participation in a Nov. 27 meeting where such plans were discussed.
The firings of eight prosecutors has since led to a political firestorm and
calls for his ouster.
At that meeting, the attorney general and at least five top Justice
Department officials discussed a five-step plan for carrying out the firings of
the prosecutors, Gonzales' aides said late Friday.
There, Gonzales signed off on the plan, which was drafted by his chief of
staff, Kyle Sampson. Sampson resigned last week.
Another Justice aide closely involved in the dismissals, White House
liaison Monica Goodling, has also taken a leave of absence, two officials
said.
The five-step plan approved by Gonzales involved notifying Republican
home-state senators of the impending dismissals, preparing for potential
political upheaval, naming replacements and submitting them to the Senate for
confirmation.
Six of the eight prosecutors who were ultimately ordered to resign are
named in the plan.
The department released more than 280 documents Friday night, including
e-mails, calendar pages and memos to try to satisfy Congress' demands for
details on how the firings were handled — and whether they were politically
motivated. There are no other meetings on the calendar pages released between
that Nov. 27 and Dec. 7, when the attorneys were fired, to indicate Gonzales
participated in other discussions on the matter, Justice spokeswoman Tasia
Scolinos said.
Scolinos said it was not immediately clear whether Gonzales gave his final
approval to begin the firings at that meeting. Scolinos also said Gonzales was
not involved in the process of selecting which prosecutors would be asked to
resign.
On March 13, in explaining the firings, Gonzales told reporters he was
aware that some of the dismissals were being discussed but was not involved in
them.
"I knew my chief of staff was involved in the process of determining who
were the weak performers — where were the districts around the country where we
could do better for the people in that district, and that's what I knew,"
Gonzales said last week. "But that is in essence what I knew about the process;
was not involved in seeing any memos, was not involved in any discussions about
what was going on. That's basically what I knew as the attorney general."
Later, he added: "I accept responsibility for everything that happens here
within this department. But when you have 110,000 people working in the
department, obviously there are going to be decisions that I'm not aware of in
real time. Many decisions are delegated."
The documents were released Friday night, a few hours after Sampson agreed
to testify at a Senate inquiry next week into the firings of eight U.S.
attorneys last year.
Asked to explain the difference between Gonzales' comments and his
schedule, Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the attorney general had
relied on Sampson to draw up the plans on the firings.
"The attorney general has made clear that he charged Mr. Sampson with
directing a plan to replace U.S. attorneys where for one reason or another the
department believed that we could do better," Roehrkasse said. "He was not,
however, involved at the levels of selecting the particular U.S. attorneys who
would be replaced."
Gonzales this week directed the Justice Department's Office of Professional
Responsibility to investigate the circumstances of the firings, officials said.
The department's inspector general also will participate in that
investigation.
Nonetheless Democrats pounced late Friday.
"Clearly the attorney general was not telling the whole truth, but what is
he trying to hide?" said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
"If the facts bear out that Attorney General Gonzales knew much more about
the plan than he has previously admitted, then he can no longer serve as
attorney general," said Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, who is heading the
Senate's investigation into the firings.
Added House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers: "This puts the
attorney general front and center in these matters, contrary to information that
had previously been provided to the public and Congress."
Presidential spokesman Trey Bohn referred questions to the Justice
Department, saying White House officials had not seen the documents.
The developments were not what Republicans, skittish about new revelations,
had hoped.
Earlier Friday, a staunch White House ally, Sen. John Cornyn, summoned
White House counsel Fred Fielding to Capitol Hill and told him he wanted "no
surprises."
"I told him, 'Everything you can release, please release. We need to know
what the facts are,'" Cornyn said.
Sampson will appear Thursday at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, his attorney said. "We trust that his decision to do so will satisfy
the need of the Congress to obtain information from him concerning the requested
resignations of the United States attorneys," Sampson attorney Brad Berenson
wrote in a letter to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee that oversees
the Justice Department.
New e-mails released Friday indicate that some of Gonzales' most trusted
advisers were kept out of the loop in the firings. Scolinos apparently learned
about the plans to dismiss attorneys on Nov. 17, 2006 — nearly two years after
Sampson and the White House first began talking about replacing prosecutors.
Democrats question whether the eight were selected because they were not
seen as, in Sampson's words, "loyal Bushies."
___
Associated Press writer Laurie Kellman contributed to this report.
|